Re: WIP: extensible enums
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>
Cc: Dean Rasheed <dean.a.rasheed@gmail.com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2010-10-17T14:38:51Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes: > On 10/17/2010 05:30 AM, Dean Rasheed wrote: >> I just thought of another corner case, which can lead to a crash. The >> comparison code assumes that the number of elements in the enumeration >> is constant during a query, but that's not necessarily the case. >> ... >> Of course that's a pathalogical example, but we should protect against >> it, preferrably without compromising performance in more normal cases. > Yeah, good point. But how do we manage that? Why is it crashing? I can see that this sort of thing might lead to nonsensical answers, but a crash is harder to understand. regards, tom "haven't read the patch" lane