Re: PATCH: logical_work_mem and logical streaming of large in-progress transactions
Erik Rijkers <er@xs4all.nl>
Commits
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Tighten the concurrent abort check during decoding.
- 2ce353fc1902 14.0 landed
-
Improve hash_create()'s API for some added robustness.
- b3817f5f7746 14.0 landed
-
Use HASH_BLOBS for xidhash.
- a1b8aa1e4eec 14.0 landed
-
Fix initialization of RelationSyncEntry for streaming transactions.
- 69bd60672af6 14.0 landed
-
Remove unused function declaration in logicalproto.h.
- ddd5f6d2609b 14.0 landed
-
Add additional tests to test streaming of in-progress transactions.
- 58b5ae9d62bd 14.0 landed
-
Fix inline marking introduced in commit 464824323e.
- ac15b499f7f9 14.0 landed
-
Add support for streaming to built-in logical replication.
- 464824323e57 14.0 landed
-
Fix the SharedFileSetUnregister API.
- 4ab77697f67a 14.0 landed
-
Fix comment in procarray.c
- 77c7267c37f7 14.0 cited
-
Suppress compiler warning in non-cassert builds.
- e942af7b8261 14.0 cited
-
Extend the BufFile interface.
- 808e13b282ef 14.0 landed
-
Mark a few logical decoding related variables with PGDLLIMPORT.
- b48cac3b10a0 14.0 landed
-
Implement streaming mode in ReorderBuffer.
- 7259736a6e5b 14.0 landed
-
Extend the logical decoding output plugin API with stream methods.
- 45fdc9738b36 14.0 landed
-
WAL Log invalidations at command end with wal_level=logical.
- c55040ccd017 14.0 landed
-
Immediately WAL-log subtransaction and top-level XID association.
- 0bead9af484c 14.0 landed
-
Allow logical replication to transfer data in binary format.
- 9de77b545313 14.0 cited
-
Only superuser can set sslcert/sslkey in postgres_fdw user mappings
- cebf9d6e6ee1 13.0 cited
-
Track statistics for spilling of changes from ReorderBuffer.
- 9290ad198b15 13.0 landed
-
Add logical_decoding_work_mem to limit ReorderBuffer memory usage.
- cec2edfa7859 13.0 landed
-
logical decoding: process ASSIGNMENT during snapshot build
- bac2fae05c77 13.0 cited
-
Emit invalidations to standby for transactions without xid.
- c6ff84b06a68 9.6.0 cited
>>>>
>>>> logical replication of 2 instances is OK but 3 and up fail with:
>>>>
>>>> TRAP: FailedAssertion("!(last_lsn < change->lsn)", File:
>>>> "reorderbuffer.c", Line: 1773)
>>>>
>>>> I can cobble up a script but I hope you have enough from the
>>>> assertion
>>>> to see what's going wrong...
>>>
>>> The assertion says that the iterator produces changes in order that
>>> does
>>> not correlate with LSN. But I have a hard time understanding how that
>>> could happen, particularly because according to the line number this
>>> happens in ReorderBufferCommit(), i.e. the current (non-streaming)
>>> case.
>>>
>>> So instructions to reproduce the issue would be very helpful.
>>
>> Using:
>>
>> 0001-Introduce-logical_work_mem-to-limit-ReorderBuffer-v2.patch
>> 0002-Issue-XLOG_XACT_ASSIGNMENT-with-wal_level-logical-v2.patch
>> 0003-Issue-individual-invalidations-with-wal_level-log-v2.patch
>> 0004-Extend-the-output-plugin-API-with-stream-methods-v2.patch
>> 0005-Implement-streaming-mode-in-ReorderBuffer-v2.patch
>> 0006-Add-support-for-streaming-to-built-in-replication-v2.patch
>>
>> As you expected the problem is the same with these new patches.
>>
>> I have now tested more, and seen that it not always fails. I guess
>> that
>> it here fails 3 times out of 4. But the laptop I'm using at the
>> moment
>> is old and slow -- it may well be a factor as we've seen before [1].
>>
>> Attached is the bash that I put together. I tested with
>> NUM_INSTANCES=2, which yields success, and NUM_INSTANCES=3, which
>> fails
>> often. This same program run with HEAD never seems to fail (I tried a
>> few dozen times).
>>
>
> Thanks. Unfortunately I still can't reproduce the issue. I even tried
> running it in valgrind, to see if there are some memory access issues
> (which should also slow it down significantly).
One wonders again if 2ndquadrant shouldn't invest in some old hardware
;)
Another Good Thing would be if there was a provision in the buildfarm to
test patches like these.
But I'm probably not to first one to suggest that; no doubt it'll be
possible someday. In the meantime I'll try to repeat this crash on
other machines (but that will be after the holidays).
Erik Rijkers