Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: ERROR: insufficient columns in the PRIMARY KEY constraint definition
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: "Godfrin, Philippe E" <Philippe.Godfrin@nov.com>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>,
David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com>,
Nagaraj Raj <nagaraj.sf@yahoo.com>,
Pg Bugs <pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org>
Date: 2020-09-30T14:16:33Z
Lists: pgsql-bugs
"Godfrin, Philippe E" <Philippe.Godfrin@nov.com> writes: > I am curious why this is considered Class 0A, versus 42 (syntax error?) FEATURE_NOT_SUPPORTED seems perfectly appropriate from here. What you tried to do is not semantically nonsensical, it's just something we can't do given the current architecture for partitioned tables. regards, tom lane
Commits
-
Reword partitioning error message
- f669ba7bdb00 12.5 landed
- 9fc212271289 14.0 landed
- 5b76e8fb675e 11.10 landed
- 49433744ff65 13.1 landed
-
Doc: Improve clarity on partitioned table limitations
- ab0c9c073563 11.10 landed
- 5c7afb4a29aa 12.5 landed
- 5610ffaf00a5 13.1 landed
- 2b888647d864 14.0 landed