Re: row filtering for logical replication
Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@enterprisedb.com>
Commits
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Release cache tuple when no longer needed
- ed0fbc8e5ac9 15.0 landed
-
Add some additional tests for row filters in logical replication.
- ceb57afd3ce1 15.0 landed
-
Fix one of the tests introduced in commit 52e4f0cd47.
- cfb4e209ec15 15.0 landed
-
Allow specifying row filters for logical replication of tables.
- 52e4f0cd472d 15.0 landed
-
Move scanint8() to numutils.c
- cfc7191dfea3 15.0 cited
-
Replace Test::More plans with done_testing
- 549ec201d613 15.0 cited
-
Reduce relcache access in WAL sender streaming logical changes
- 6ce16088bfed 15.0 cited
-
Small cleanups related to PUBLICATION framework code
- c9105dd3660f 15.0 cited
-
Add a view to show the stats of subscription workers.
- 8d74fc96db5f 15.0 cited
-
Allow publishing the tables of schema.
- 5a2832465fd8 15.0 cited
-
Doc: improve documentation of CREATE/ALTER SUBSCRIPTION.
- 1882d6cca161 15.0 cited
-
Add PublicationTable and PublicationRelInfo structs
- 0c6828fa987b 15.0 cited
-
Remove unused argument "txn" in maybe_send_schema().
- 93d573d86571 15.0 cited
-
Add prepare API support for streaming transactions in logical replication.
- 63cf61cdeb7b 15.0 cited
-
Unify PostgresNode's new() and get_new_node() methods
- 201a76183e20 15.0 cited
-
Use l*_node() family of functions where appropriate
- 2b00db4fb0c7 15.0 cited
-
Add support for prepared transactions to built-in logical replication.
- a8fd13cab0ba 15.0 cited
-
Restore the portal-level snapshot after procedure COMMIT/ROLLBACK.
- ef9480509622 11.13 cited
-
Rename a parse node to be more general
- 91d1f2d30210 14.0 landed
-
Remove unused column atttypmod from initial tablesync query
- 4ad31bb2ef25 14.0 landed
-
SEARCH and CYCLE clauses
- 3696a600e229 14.0 cited
Attachments
- crash.txt (text/plain)
Hi,
I took a look at this patch, which seems to be in CF since 2018. I have
only some basic comments and observations at this point:
1) alter_publication.sgml
I think "expression is executed" sounds a bit strange, perhaps
"evaluated" would be better?
2) create_publication.sgml
Why is the patch changing publish_via_partition_root docs? That seems
like a rather unrelated bit.
The <literal>WHERE</literal> clause should probably contain only
columns that are part of the primary key or be covered by
<literal>REPLICA ...
I'm not sure what exactly is this trying to say. What does "should
probably ..." mean in practice for the users? Does that mean something
bad will happen for other columns, or what? I'm sure this wording will
be quite confusing for users.
It may also be unclear whether the condition is evaluated on the old or
new row, so perhaps add an example illustrating that & more detailed
comment, or something. E.g. what will happen with
UPDATE departments SET active = false WHERE active;
3) publication_add_relation
Does this need to build the parse state even for whereClause == NULL?
4) AlterPublicationTables
I wonder if this new reworked code might have issues with subscriptions
containing many tables, but I haven't tried.
5) OpenTableList
I really dislike that the list can have two different node types
(Relation and PublicationTable). In principle we don't actually need the
extra flag, we can simply check the node type directly by IsA() and act
based on that. However, I think it'd be better to just use a single node
type from all places.
I don't see why not to set whereClause every time, I don't think the
extra if saves anything, it's just a bit more complex.
5) CloseTableList
The comment about node types seems pointless, this function has no flag
and the element type does not matter.
6) parse_agg.c
... are not allowed in publication WHERE expressions
I think all similar cases use "WHERE conditions" instead.
7) transformExprRecurse
The check at the beginning seems rather awkward / misplaced - it's way
too specific for this location (there are no other p_expr_kind
references in this function). Wouldn't transformFuncCall (or maybe
ParseFuncOrColumn) be a more appropriate place?
Initially I was wondering why not to allow function calls in WHERE
conditions, but I see that was discussed in the past as problematic. But
that reminds me that I don't see any docs describing what expressions
are allowed in WHERE conditions - maybe we should explicitly list what
expressions are allowed?
8) pgoutput.c
I have not reviewed this in detail yet, but there seems to be something
wrong because `make check-world` fails in subscription/010_truncate.pl
after hitting an assert (backtrace attached) during "START_REPLICATION
SLOT" in get_rel_sync_entry in this code:
/* Release tuple table slot */
if (entry->scantuple != NULL)
{
ExecDropSingleTupleTableSlot(entry->scantuple);
entry->scantuple = NULL;
}
So there seems to be something wrong with how the slot is created.
regards
--
Tomas Vondra
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company