Re: Experience and feedback on pg_restore --data-only

Adrian Klaver <adrian.klaver@aklaver.com>

From: Adrian Klaver <adrian.klaver@aklaver.com>
To: Dimitrios Apostolou <jimis@gmx.net>, Laurenz Albe <laurenz.albe@cybertec.at>
Cc: pgsql-general@lists.postgresql.org
Date: 2025-03-24T15:31:49Z
Lists: pgsql-general
On 3/24/25 07:24, Dimitrios Apostolou wrote:
> On Sun, 23 Mar 2025, Laurenz Albe wrote:
> 
>> On Thu, 2025-03-20 at 23:48 +0100, Dimitrios Apostolou wrote:
>>> Performance issues: (important as my db size is >5TB)
>>>
>>> * WAL writes: I didn't manage to avoid writing to the WAL, despite 
>>> having
>>>    setting wal_level=minimal. I even wrote my own function to ALTER all
>>>    tables to UNLOGGED, but failed with "could not change table T to
>>>    unlogged because it references logged table".  I'm out of ideas on 
>>> this
>>>    one.
>>
>> You'd have to create an load the table in the same transaction, that is,
>> you'd have to run pg_restore with --single-transaction.
> 
> That would restore the schema from the dump, while I want to create the
> schema from the SQL code in version control.


I am not following, from your original post:

"
  ... create a
clean database by running the SQL schema definition from version 
control, and then copy the data for only the tables created.

For this case, I choose to run pg_restore --data-only, and run it as the 
user who owns the database (dbowner), not as a superuser, in order to 
avoid changes being introduced under the radar.
"

You are running the process in two steps, where the first does not 
involve pg_restore. Not sure why doing the pg_restore --data-only 
portion in single transaction is not possible?

> 
> Something that might work, would be for pg_restore to issue a TRUNCATE
> before the COPY. I believe this would require superuser privelege though,
> that I would prefer to avoid. Currently I issue TRUNCATE for all tables
> manually before running pg_restore, but of course this is in a different
> transaction so it doesn't help.
> 
> By the way do you see potential problems with using --single-transaction
> to restore billion-rows tables?

COPY is all or none(version 17+ caveat(see 
https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/sql-copy.html  ON_ERROR)), so if 
the data dump fails in --single-transaction everything rolls back.

> 
> 
> Thank you,
> Dimitris

-- 
Adrian Klaver
adrian.klaver@aklaver.com