Horton

Re: .gitignore files, take two

Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>

View thread
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2010-09-21T20:11:50Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers 
I wrote:
> Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> writes:
>> Do we know what the exact pattern would be for .sl and .dylib? Are
>> they following the same basic pattern of .sl.<major>.<minor>?

> Yes, they'll be just the same --- Makefile.shlib treats all those
> extensions alike.

I take that back.  Darwin does things differently, bless their pointy
little heads:

    DLSUFFIX		= .dylib
    shlib		= lib$(NAME).$(SO_MAJOR_VERSION).$(SO_MINOR_VERSION)$(DLSUFFIX)

So it looks like *.dylib is sufficient and we don't need anything with
numbers afterwards for that variant.

			regards, tom lane