Re: C11 / VS 2019

Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>

From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>

To: Yura Sokolov <y.sokolov@postgrespro.ru>

Cc: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>, Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentraut.org>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>

Date: 2025-06-03T14:01:58Z

Lists: pgsql-hackers

Yura Sokolov <y.sokolov@postgrespro.ru> writes:
> Will it mean we can implement atomics in term of C11 atomics?

Any such change would have to be supported by extensive performance
testing to verify that there's not a regression on any supported
platform.  Yeah, it'd be cool if we could rip out a lot of that
code, but we aren't going to just rip on faith.

			regards, tom lane

Commits

Same data as JSON: GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources. API reference →

Raise C requirement to C11
- f5e0186f865c 19 (unreleased) landed
meson: Move C99 test earlier
- 4a4038068bb2 19 (unreleased) landed
Enable MSVC conforming preprocessor
- 8fd9bb1d9654 19 (unreleased) landed
Make parseNodeString() C idiom compatible with Visual Studio 2015.
- f9f31aa91f82 16.0 cited