Horton

Re: 16-bit page checksums for 9.2

Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>

View thread
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Cc: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>, Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>, Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com>, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>, Kevin Grittner <kevin.grittner@wicourts.gov>, david <david@fetter.org>, aidan <aidan@highrise.ca>, stark <stark@mit.edu>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2012-02-29T21:34:27Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Commits

Same data as JSON: GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources. API reference →

  1. Wakeup WALWriter as needed for asynchronous commit performance.

Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
> On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 2:33 PM, Heikki Linnakangas
> <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
>> The utility would run in the old cluster before upgrading, so the the flag
>> would have to be present in the old version. pg_upgrade would check that the
>> flag is set, refusing to upgrade if it isn't, with an error like "please run
>> pre-upgrade utility first".

> I find that a pretty unappealing design; it seems to me it'd be much
> easier to make the new cluster cope with everything.

Easier for who?  I don't care for the idea of code that has to cope with
two page formats, or before long N page formats, because if we don't
have some mechanism like this then we will never be able to decide that
an old data format is safely dead.

			regards, tom lane