Re: Page Checksums
Florian Weimer <fweimer@bfk.de>
From: Florian Weimer <fweimer@bfk.de>
To: Robert Treat <rob@xzilla.net>
Cc: Jim Nasby <jim@nasby.net>, Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, David Fetter <david@fetter.org>, Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>, Aidan Van Dyk <aidan@highrise.ca>, Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org, Greg Smith <greg@2ndquadrant.com>, Koichi Suzuki <koichi.szk@gmail.com>
Date: 2012-01-24T07:57:21Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
* Robert Treat: > Would it be unfair to assert that people who want checksums but aren't > willing to pay the cost of running a filesystem that provides > checksums aren't going to be willing to make the cost/benefit trade > off that will be asked for? Yes, it is unfair of course, but it's > interesting how small the camp of those using checksummed filesystems > is. Don't checksumming file systems currently come bundled with other features you might not want (such as certain vendors)? -- Florian Weimer <fweimer@bfk.de> BFK edv-consulting GmbH http://www.bfk.de/ Kriegsstraße 100 tel: +49-721-96201-1 D-76133 Karlsruhe fax: +49-721-96201-99