Re: Setting restrictedtoken in pg_regress
Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>
From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>
To: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com>,
Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Cc: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se>,
PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2023-06-14T11:02:30Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On 2023-06-12 Mo 19:43, Nathan Bossart wrote: > On Tue, Jun 13, 2023 at 08:29:19AM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote: >> I am actually a bit confused with the return value of >> CreateRestrictedProcess() on failures in restricted_token.c. Wouldn't >> it be cleaner to return INVALID_HANDLE_VALUE rather than 0 in these >> cases? > My suspicion is that this was chosen to align with CreateProcess and to > allow things like > > if (!CreateRestrictedProcess(...)) Probably, it's been a while. I doubt it's worth changing at this point, and we could just change pg_regress.c to use a boolean test like the above. cheers andrew -- Andrew Dunstan EDB:https://www.enterprisedb.com
Commits
-
pg_regress: Remove unused variable
- f863d82b2f98 17.0 landed