Re: POC, WIP: OR-clause support for indexes
Alena Rybakina <a.rybakina@postgrespro.ru>
Commits
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Make group_similar_or_args() reorder clause list as little as possible
- 775a06d44c04 18.0 landed
-
Allow usage of match_orclause_to_indexcol() for joins
- 627d63419e22 18.0 landed
-
Skip not SOAP-supported indexes while transforming an OR clause into SAOP
- 5bba0546eecb 18.0 landed
-
Remove the wrong assertion from match_orclause_to_indexcol()
- d4d11940df94 18.0 landed
-
Teach bitmap path generation about transforming OR-clauses to SAOP's
- ae4569161a27 18.0 landed
-
Transform OR-clauses to SAOP's during index matching
- d4378c0005e6 18.0 landed
-
Fix the value of or_to_any_transform_limit in postgresql.conf.sample
- 2af75e117478 17.0 landed
-
Transform OR clauses to ANY expression
- 72bd38cc99a1 17.0 landed
-
MergeAttributes code deduplication
- 64444ce071f6 17.0 cited
-
SEARCH and CYCLE clauses
- 3696a600e229 14.0 cited
-
Improve estimation of OR clauses using extended statistics.
- 25a9e54d2db3 14.0 cited
-
Teach btree to handle ScalarArrayOpExpr quals natively.
- 9e8da0f75731 9.2.0 cited
-
Revise collation derivation method and expression-tree representation.
- b310b6e31ce5 9.1.0 cited
-
Instead of trying to force WHERE clauses into CNF or DNF normal form,
- 9888192fb773 8.0.0 cited
On 23.08.2024 19:38, Alexander Korotkov wrote: > Hi, Alena! > > On Fri, Aug 23, 2024 at 5:06 PM Alena Rybakina > <a.rybakina@postgrespro.ru> wrote: >> To be fair, I fixed this before [0] by selecting the appropriate group >> of "or" expressions to transform them to "ANY" expression and then >> checking for compatibility with the index column. maybe we should try >> this too? I can think about it. >> >> [0] >> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/531fc0ab-371e-4235-97e3-dd2d077b6995%40postgrespro.ru > I probably didn't get your message. Which patch version you think > resolve the problem? I see [0] doesn't contain any patch. Sorry, I got the links mixed up. We need this link [0]. > > I think further progress in this area of grouping OR args is possible > if there is a solution, which doesn't take extraordinary computational > complexity. This approach does not require a large overhead - in fact, we separately did the conversion to "any" once going through the list of restrictinfo, we form candidates in the form of boolexpr using the "and" operator, which contains "any" and "or" expression, then we check with index columns which expression suits us. -- Regards, Alena Rybakina Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com The Russian Postgres Company