Horton

Re: I: About "Our CLUSTER implementation is pessimal" patch

Leonardo Francalanci <m_lists@yahoo.it>

View thread
From: Leonardo Francalanci <m_lists@yahoo.it>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2010-09-29T15:55:14Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers 
> > Here's my post with a (very simple) performance test:
> > http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2010-02/msg00766.php
> I  think the 10M rows test is more in line with what we want (83s vs.  646).


Can someone else test the patch to see if what I found is still valid?
I don't think it makes much sense if I'm the only one that says
"this is faster" :)