Re: Alpha4 release blockers (was Re: wrapping up this CommitFest)
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org, Rémi Zara <remi_zara@mac.com>, Stefan Huehner <stefan@huehner.org>
Date: 2011-03-07T17:40:55Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Commits
Same data as JSON:
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Further refine patch for commenting operator implementation functions.
- 908ab8028640 9.1.0 cited
-
Fix citext's upgrade-from-unpackaged script to set its collation correctly.
- 94be9e3f0ca9 9.1.0 cited
-
Mark operator implementation functions as such in their comments.
- 94133a935414 9.1.0 cited
-
Add KNNGIST support to contrib/btree_gist.
- 8436489c81c2 9.1.0 cited
-
Fix plpython breakage detected on certain Fedora machines on buildfarm.
- 4c966d920fb7 9.1.0 cited
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes: > On sn, 2011-03-06 at 12:16 -0500, Tom Lane wrote: >> I'm still not thrilled with the plan of sprinkling the code with >> random fmgr_info_collation() calls to make up for the lack of a sane >> default. IMO, that *is* a default, just a badly implemented one. > We have touched upon this point several times during the development of > this patch. The main problem is that you need to distinguish no > collation from the default collation, so they can't both be OID zero. Fair enough, but throwing in fmgr_info_collation(DEFAULT_COLLATION) anytime we have a problem seems to me to introduce the exact same issue. Who's to say that that's really the appropriate value to use? regards, tom lane