Horton

Re: documentation fixes for partition pruning, round three

Amit Langote <langote_amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp>

View thread View on postgr.es
From: Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp>
To: David Rowley <david.rowley@2ndquadrant.com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>, Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com>, Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh.bapat@enterprisedb.com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2018-07-06T01:49:50Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers 
On 2018/07/06 6:55, David Rowley wrote:
> On 6 July 2018 at 09:41, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
>> On 2018-Jul-05, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>>> Committed.
>>
>> Thanks for handling this.
>>
>> Should we do this in REL_11_STABLE too?  I vote yes.
> 
> Sorry for now paying much attention to this, but I've read through
> what's been committed and I also think PG11 deserves this too.

+1

Thanks Justin and Peter.

Regards,
Amit

Commits

  1. Tweak partitioning documentation wording

  2. docs: Rework sections on partition pruning/exclusion

  3. Add GUC enable_partition_pruning