Horton

Re: OpenSSL 1.1 breaks configure and more

Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>

View thread View on postgr.es
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Andreas Karlsson <andreas@proxel.se>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>, Christoph Berg <myon@debian.org>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi>, Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>, Victor Wagner <vitus@wagner.pp.ru>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2017-04-16T22:26:34Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers 
Andreas Karlsson <andreas@proxel.se> writes:
> On 04/16/2017 03:14 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> 1. Back-patch that patch, probably also including the followup adjustments
>> in 86029b31e and 36a3be654.

> Given that I cannot recall seeing any complaints about the behavior of 
> 9.4 compared to 9.3 I am leaning towards #1. That way there are fewer 
> different versions of our OpenSSL code.

Yeah, I was thinking about that point too.  Barring objections I'll
do #1 and then move forward with the openssl 1.1 backport.

			regards, tom lane

Commits

  1. Back-patch 9.4-era SSL renegotiation code into 9.3 and 9.2.