Re: subversion vs cvs (Was: Re: linked list rewrite)
Dustin Sallings <dustin@spy.net>
From: Dustin Sallings <dustin@spy.net>
To: Neil Conway <neilc@samurai.com>
Cc: "Matthew T. O'Connor" <matthew@zeut.net>, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, David Garamond <lists@zara.6.isreserved.com>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2004-03-25T20:03:36Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Mar 25, 2004, at 1:21, Neil Conway wrote: > I think the lack of good Win32 support (unless rectified before the > release of 7.5) is a pretty major problem with Arch -- that alone > might be sufficient to prevent us from adopting it. I don't do Windows, but my understanding is that tla is as well supported on Windows as postgres is. The design is fundamentally easy enough that a Windows user who cares could probably make a more suitable port for Windows than the UNIX guys are interested in making. I've seen such discussions on the list. -- Dustin Sallings