Re: subversion vs cvs (Was: Re: linked list rewrite)

Dustin Sallings <dustin@spy.net>

From: Dustin Sallings <dustin@spy.net>
To: Neil Conway <neilc@samurai.com>
Cc: "Matthew T. O'Connor" <matthew@zeut.net>, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, David Garamond <lists@zara.6.isreserved.com>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2004-03-25T20:03:36Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Mar 25, 2004, at 1:21, Neil Conway wrote:

> I think the lack of good Win32 support (unless rectified before the 
> release of 7.5) is a pretty major problem with Arch -- that alone 
> might be sufficient to prevent us from adopting it.

	I don't do Windows, but my understanding is that tla is as well 
supported on Windows as postgres is.

	The design is fundamentally easy enough that a Windows user who cares 
could probably make a more suitable port for Windows than the UNIX guys 
are interested in making.  I've seen such discussions on the list.

-- 
Dustin Sallings