Re: documentation structure

Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>

From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: "David G. Johnston" <david.g.johnston@gmail.com>
Cc: Tatsuo Ishii <ishii@postgresql.org>, andrew@dunslane.net, corey.huinker@gmail.com, jian.universality@gmail.com, robertmhaas@gmail.com, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2024-07-19T20:17:41Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Commits

Same data as JSON: GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources. API reference →
  1. docs: Consistently use <optional> to indicate optional parameters

  2. docs: Consolidate into new "WAL for Extensions" chapter.

  3. freespace: Don't return blocks past the end of the main fork.

  4. docs: Merge separate chapters on built-in index AMs into one.

  5. docs: Demote "Monitoring Disk Usage" from chapter to section.

  6. doc: move system views section to its own chapter

"David G. Johnston" <david.g.johnston@gmail.com> writes:
> +many for placing these under a subdirectory.

> IMO the file name should match the ID of the sect1 element with the leading
> "functions-" removed, naming the directory "functions".  Thus when viewing
> the web page the corresponding sgml file is determinable.

I'd go for shorter myself (ie "func/"), mainly due to the precedent
of the existing subdirectory which is "ref/" not "reference/".
It's hardly a big deal though.

			regards, tom lane