Re: pgindent run?

Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>

From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2001-03-22T04:35:07Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> Hey, I am open to whatever people want to do.  Just remember that we
> accumulate lots of patches/development during the slow time before
> development, and those patches become harder to apply.  Peter E has some
> already.

Why not start a devel cycle by (a) branching the tree, (b) applying
all held-over patches, and then (c) running pgindent?

I'd probably wait a week or so between (a) and (c) to let people push
in whatever they have pending.  But in general it seems a lot safer
to pgindent at the front end of the cycle not the back end.

			regards, tom lane