Re: pgindent run?
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2001-03-22T04:35:07Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes: > Hey, I am open to whatever people want to do. Just remember that we > accumulate lots of patches/development during the slow time before > development, and those patches become harder to apply. Peter E has some > already. Why not start a devel cycle by (a) branching the tree, (b) applying all held-over patches, and then (c) running pgindent? I'd probably wait a week or so between (a) and (c) to let people push in whatever they have pending. But in general it seems a lot safer to pgindent at the front end of the cycle not the back end. regards, tom lane