Re: base backup client as auxiliary backend process

Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>
To: Masahiko Sawada <masahiko.sawada@2ndquadrant.com>
Cc: Sergei Kornilov <sk@zsrv.org>, Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2020-01-14T13:58:23Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On 2020-01-14 07:32, Masahiko Sawada wrote:
> -     <entry>Replication slot name used by this WAL receiver</entry>
> +     <entry>
> +      Replication slot name used by this WAL receiver.  This is only set if a
> +      permanent replication slot is set using <xref
> +      linkend="guc-primary-slot-name"/>.  Otherwise, the WAL receiver may use
> +      a temporary replication slot (determined by <xref
> +      linkend="guc-wal-receiver-create-temp-slot"/>), but these are not shown
> +      here.
> +     </entry>
> 
> Now that the slot name is shown even if it's a temp slot the above
> documentation changes needs to be changed. Other changes look good to
> me.

committed, thanks

-- 
Peter Eisentraut              http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services



Commits

  1. Factor out InitControlFile() from BootStrapXLOG()

  2. Reformat code comment

  3. pg_resetwal: Rename function to avoid potential conflict

  4. Expose PQbackendPID() through walreceiver API

  5. walreceiver uses a temporary replication slot by default

  6. Make lsn argument of walrcv_create_slot() optional

  7. More precise errors from initial pg_control check