Thread

  1. Re: Replace is_publishable_class() with relispublishable column in pg_class

    Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentraut.org> — 2025-12-17T15:29:56Z

    On 17.12.25 08:07, Peter Smith wrote:
    > 0. AFAIK, anything named with a "pg_" prefix generally means that the
    > named thing is intended for PG internal use, right?
    
    This might be a convention, but it's not enforced by the system, except 
    for some object types like schemas and tablespaces.