Re: VLDB Features
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: NikhilS <nikkhils@gmail.com>
Cc: "Neil Conway" <neilc@samurai.com>, "Hannu Krosing" <hannu@skype.net>, "Josh Berkus" <josh@agliodbs.com>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org, "Simon Riggs" <simon@2ndquadrant.com>
Date: 2007-12-15T07:44:56Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Commits
Same data as JSON:
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
doc: Fix COPY ON_ERROR option syntax synopsis.
- f6f8ac8e75c9 17.0 landed
-
Disallow specifying ON_ERROR option without value.
- a6d0fa5ef840 17.0 landed
-
Rename COPY option from SAVE_ERROR_TO to ON_ERROR
- b725b7eec431 17.0 landed
-
Fix spelling in notice
- 58fbbc9d683c 17.0 landed
-
Add new COPY option SAVE_ERROR_TO
- 9e2d8701194f 17.0 landed
NikhilS <nikkhils@gmail.com> writes: > Any errors which occur before doing the heap_insert should not require > any recovery according to me. A sufficient (though far from all-encompassing) rejoinder to that is "triggers and CHECK constraints can do anything". > The overhead of having a subtransaction per row is a very valid concern. But > instead of using a per insert or a batch insert substraction, I am > thinking that we can start off a subtraction and continue it till we > encounter a failure. What of failures that occur only at (sub)transaction commit, such as foreign key checks? regards, tom lane