Thread

  1. warning under gcc 16.1.0

    Erik Rijkers <er@xs4all.nl> — 2026-04-30T20:52:36Z

    Compiling with gcc 16.1.0 gives the following warning and notes:
    (horizontally compressed a bit te avoid excessive wrapping)
    
    
    clauses.c: In function ‘recheck_cast_function_args.isra’:
    clauses.c:5139:19: warning: ‘actual_arg_types’ may be used uninitialized 
    [-Wmaybe-uninitialized]
      5139 |   rettype = enforce_generic_type_consistency(actual_arg_types,
           |             ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
      5140 |                declared_arg_types,
           |                ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
      5141 |                nargs,
           |                ~~~~~~
      5142 |                funcform->prorettype,
           |                ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
      5143 |                false);
           |                ~~~~~~
    In file included from clauses.c:46:
    ../../../../src/include/parser/parse_coerce.h:85:17: note: by argument 1 
    of type ‘const Oid *’ {aka ‘const unsigned int *’} to 
    ‘enforce_generic_type_consistency’ declared here
        85 | extern Oid      enforce_generic_type_consistency(const Oid 
    *actual_arg_types,
           |                 ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    clauses.c:5125:33: note: ‘actual_arg_types’ declared here
      5125 |         Oid                     actual_arg_types[FUNC_MAX_ARGS];
           |                                 ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    
    
    HTH,
    
    Erik
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
  2. Re: warning under gcc 16.1.0

    Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> — 2026-04-30T21:21:51Z

    Erik Rijkers <er@xs4all.nl> writes:
    > Compiling with gcc 16.1.0 gives the following warning and notes:
    > (horizontally compressed a bit te avoid excessive wrapping)
    
    > clauses.c: In function ‘recheck_cast_function_args.isra’:
    > clauses.c:5139:19: warning: ‘actual_arg_types’ may be used uninitialized 
    > [-Wmaybe-uninitialized]
    
    I'm inclined to write that off as "buggy early-version compiler".
    That code is visibly okay, and no other compiler version has warned
    about it.
    
    			regards, tom lane