Re: RFC: Additional Directory for Extensions
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Matheus Alcantara <matheusssilv97@gmail.com>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentraut.org>,
Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>,
Gabriele Bartolini <gabriele.bartolini@enterprisedb.com>,
Craig Ringer <craig.ringer@enterprisedb.com>,
"David E. Wheeler" <david@justatheory.com>,
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>,
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>,
PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2025-03-19T19:42:46Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Matheus Alcantara <matheusssilv97@gmail.com> writes: > (Not sure if we should also improve the message to make the test failure less > opaque?) Yeah, I was wondering how to do that. The earlier tests in that script show the whole row from pg_available_extensions, not just a bool ... but that doesn't help if the problem is we don't find a row. regards, tom lane
Commits
-
doc: Flesh out extension docs for the "prefix" make variable
- 0064020680c1 18.0 landed
-
Fix extension control path tests
- b7076c1e7f43 18.0 landed
-
extension_control_path
- 4f7f7b037585 18.0 landed