Re: [Bizgres-general] WAL bypass for INSERT, UPDATE and
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
Cc: Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>, kleptog@svana.org, simon@2ndquadrant.com, gsstark@mit.edu, pg@rbt.ca, zhouqq@cs.toronto.edu, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2005-12-29T16:24:28Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes: > Andrew Dunstan wrote: >> I an horribly scared that this will be used as a "performance boost" for >> normal use. I would at least like to see some restrictions that make it >> harder to mis-use. Perhaps restrict to superuser? > Certainly restrict to table owner. I can see the argument for superuser-only: decisions about data integrity tradeoffs should be reserved to the DBA, who is the one who will get blamed if the database loses data, no matter how stupid his users are. But I'm not wedded to that. I could live with table-owner. regards, tom lane