Re: Report: removing the inconsistencies in our CVS->git conversion
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Commits
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Applied patch to jdbc from Kim Ho at RedHat, fixing improper handling of empty queries under the V3 protocol
- e8839c2b6c00 7.4.1 cited
-
Applied patch for jdbc from Kim Ho at RedHat to more correctly deal with boolean values
- c020d67bc692 7.4.1 cited
-
Applied patch from Oliver Jowett to improve a buffer sizing.
- d7c609f7c4de 7.4.1 cited
-
Code cleanup inspired by recent resname bug report (doesn't fix the bug
- 88381ade63de 7.4.1 cited
-
Pass shared memory id and socket descriptor number on command line for
- d9fd7d12f6c0 7.4.1 cited
-
Second try at avoiding conflicts with system isblank().
- e3859d1ad982 7.2.5 cited
-
Applied Kris Jurkas patch to fix rollback and SQLException
- 985e551b4866 7.4.1 cited
-
applied patch from Oliver Jowett
- d23fd9572b4c 7.4.1 cited
-
Make the world at least somewhat safe for zero-column tables, and
- 6d0d15c45173 7.3.1 cited
-
Add mention of -F not supported by pg_dumpall. Code already disallows it.
- c43760a7143b 7.3.1 cited
-
Two versions of QueryExecutor, currently only version 2 works 100%
- 78d40a2a2f41 7.3.1 cited
-
modifications to the way the protocol is handled to be consistent with
- 54cc549d8f25 7.3.1 cited
-
Part of Anders Bengtsson's patch to clean up Connection.java
- 00923229c2f0 7.3.1 cited
-
Applied Anders patch to move the startup code out of Connection into StartupPacket
- d96c29ab301a 7.3.1 cited
-
>Added ServerEncoding
- eb1fb8650fb2 7.3.1 cited
-
> I am backing out this patch. Please resubmit with this corrected. Thanks.
- d3337c6e3f9b 7.3.1 cited
-
Fixes bug where query hangs if there is an error in the query, went back to
- 202a19e47bfd 7.3.1 cited
-
Backpatch array I/O code and documentation fixes, also array slice
- bbc1fb07c625 7.2.1 cited
-
fixed QueryExecuter to deal with multiple errors
- 134fe5ec61cb 7.3.1 cited
-
Repair bad calculation in timetz_izone() which gave erroneous results.
- efec53adb3a3 7.2.1 cited
-
backed out changes for cancel, no need to look for two 'Z' responses
- ffe356b5dd39 7.3.1 cited
-
Patch by Nicolas Verger to correctly propogate SQLWarning to the Statement and ResultSet
- 29ea8ff9b13f 7.3.1 cited
-
fixed cancel query bug introduced by patch
- ff2f9b663f73 7.3.1 cited
-
Autoconf for jdbc debug changes.
- b7cc409f7f5e 7.3.1 cited
-
Updated the list of encodings supported to match what the backend now supports
- bf737b859f7e 7.2.1 cited
-
Added some additional comments in the code
- f50793c743c7 7.2.1 cited
-
Update TODO list.
- 311eef41ea01 7.2.1 cited
-
Remove ConnectionHook.java. No longer used, bad code.
- 5621ec0629b1 7.2.1 cited
-
The attached patch removes some old and dead code (and some related
- 0e4d43f4593c 7.2.1 cited
-
First batch of the tools merged in...
- e2e84a1c5e13 7.1.1 cited
-
This patch fixes an arrayindexoutofbounds exception that was just
- 4e45005ffb8f 7.1.1 cited
-
Add ./include/config.h.win32 to RELEASE update list.
- ba6fda5191a1 7.1.1 cited
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes: > On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 12:23 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >> Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes: >>> We're not planning to delete the CVS repository, are we? >> >> Not in the short term, but I'd like to think that the git repository >> will contain everything of conceivable interest. > Hmm, OK. That's never really been one of my goals. :-) I will confess to moving the goal posts a bit ;-). If we didn't have such a near-perfect conversion, I would be willing to throw stuff overboard on the grounds that people could go back to the CVS repository if they cared. But we are at a point now where it's very hard to conceive of a reason for needing to do that. So I don't want to arbitrarily create reasons. > I want a good, clean, complete history in git, but ancient partial > branches are below my threshold for caring. But if you feel it's > useful, we can keep the tag - I don't care enough to argue about it. ... but having said that, I'm not sure that the ecpg_big_bison branch should be considered part of the core project history. You could certainly argue that it wouldn't be there anyway if we'd had better tools. Again, I'd be interested to hear some other people's opinions. regards, tom lane