Re: [HACKERS] SAP and MySQL ... [and Benchmark]
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Robert Treat <xzilla@users.sourceforge.net>
Cc: Lamar Owen <lamar.owen@wgcr.org>, Justin Clift <justin@postgresql.org>, Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>, jim@nasby.net, "pgsql-general@postgresql.org" <pgsql-general@postgresql.org>
Date: 2003-06-13T14:56:22Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Robert Treat <xzilla@users.sourceforge.net> writes: > On Fri, 2003-06-13 at 01:08, Tom Lane wrote: >> I wouldn't mind seeing a "core marketing" team evolve to parallel the >> existing "core technical" team. > This overlooks the fact that you can't earn credibility with some of our > community unless you hack on the back-end. That is the standard way to earn *technical* credibility in this community, sure. What I'm suggesting is that credibility in the advocacy/marketing area is a different currency. I still think you have to earn the respect of your peers by hard work, but exactly what that work is is quite different. Being a geek with no clue about marketing, I don't actually know how one would go about building a reputation in this area. I do know that having the technical core team bless your efforts won't create any credibility of that kind, because we have none to give. > The uproar over the 7.3 press > release was a fine example of what happens when the "advocacy" guys try > to make a change to something non-technical that the "technical" guys > don't approve of. AFAIR people didn't have a problem with the press release as press release, they just said that what *they* wanted to read was a more technically oriented document, and they were bemoaning the lack of one. regards, tom lane