Horton

Re: [HACKERS] Proposal: Local indexes for partitioned table

Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>

View thread View on postgr.es
From: Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>, David Rowley <david.rowley@2ndquadrant.com>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp>, Jesper Pedersen <jesper.pedersen@redhat.com>, Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>, Maksim Milyutin <milyutinma@gmail.com>, Jaime Casanova <jaime.casanova@2ndquadrant.com>
Date: 2018-01-12T16:51:24Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers 
On 1/11/18 13:52, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> The delta patch turned out to have at least one stupid bug, and a few
> non-stupid bugs.  Here's an updated version that should behave
> correctly, and addresses all reported problems.

It seems that CompareIndexInfo() still doesn't compare indexes' operator
classes and collations.

Also, some new test cases for pg_dump would be nice.

-- 
Peter Eisentraut              http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

Commits

  1. Local partitioned indexes

  2. Fix StoreCatalogInheritance1 to use 32bit inhseqno

  3. Get rid of copy_partition_key

  4. Simplify index_[constraint_]create API