Re: Reduce build times of pg_trgm GIN indexes
David Geier <geidav.pg@gmail.com>
From: David Geier <geidav.pg@gmail.com>
To: Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi>, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: Matthias van de Meent <boekewurm+postgres@gmail.com>,
pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2026-04-14T07:02:10Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
> I didn't do it for performance, but because I find the function easier
> to read that way. We could change it back.
>
> It's a pretty scary thought that a compiler might misoptimize that
> though. In the same function we have 'nullFlags', too, as a local
> variable, even before this commit. Not sure why Coverity doesn't
> complain about that.
>
>> /*
>> * PointerGetDatum
>> * Returns datum representation for a pointer.
>> */
>> static inline Datum
>> PointerGetDatum(const void *X)
>> {
>> return (Datum) (uintptr_t) X;
>> }
>
> Hmm, is that 'const' incorrect? This function doesn't modify *X, but the
> resulting address will be used to modify it. Maybe changing it to non-
> const "void *X" would give Coverity a hint.
Ah, that could be it.
Is there a way for me to run Coverity on a patch to test that out?
Which Coverity CI do we actually use? Is it this one here [1]?
[1] https://scan.coverity.com/projects/209?
--
David Geier
Commits
Same data as JSON:
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Change PointerGetDatum() back to a macro
- d65995cbc6e1 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Replace deprecated StaticAssertStmt() with StaticAssertDecl()
- 66ad764c8d51 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Optimize sorting and deduplicating trigrams
- 9f3755ea07aa 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Optimize sort and deduplication in ginExtractEntries()
- 6f5ad00ab763 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Inline ginCompareAttEntries for speed
- bba81f9d3d4f 19 (unreleased) landed