Re: Good name for new lock type for VACUUM?
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: "Hiroshi Inoue" <Inoue@tpf.co.jp>
Cc: "Peter Eisentraut" <peter_e@gmx.net>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2001-06-23T15:51:42Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
"Hiroshi Inoue" <Inoue@tpf.co.jp> writes: > Isn't it a better idea to have a separate 'SELF EXCLUSIVE' lock > which conflicts with only itself ? *Only* itself? What would that be useful for? Not for locking tables, anyway --- if you don't conflict with AccessExclusiveLock then it's possible for someone to drop the table while you're working on it. regards, tom lane