Re: Big 7.1 open items
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Thomas Lockhart <lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu>
Cc: Jan Wieck <JanWieck@Yahoo.com>, Hiroshi Inoue <Inoue@tpf.co.jp>, Bruce Momjian <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>, "Ross J. Reedstrom" <reedstrm@rice.edu>
Date: 2000-06-16T16:54:00Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Thomas Lockhart <lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu> writes: >> ... But I think it's critical to keep >> the low-level file access protocol simple and reliable, which really >> means minimizing the amount of information the backend needs to know >> to figure out which file to write a page in. With something like the >> above you only need to know the tablespace name (or more likely OID), >> the relation OID (+name or not, depending on outcome of other >> argument), and the offset in the table. No worse than now from the >> software's point of view. >> Comments? > I'm probably missing the context a bit, but imho we should try hard to > stay away from symlinks as the general solution for anything. Why? regards, tom lane