Re: BUG #18224: message bug in libpqwalreceiver.c.
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se>
Cc: king tomo <t.katsumata1122@gmail.com>, pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org
Date: 2023-12-04T14:07:29Z
Lists: pgsql-bugs
Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se> writes: > I've changed > it to add a comment instead which explains why we check for < 3 and write that > we expect 4 in the error message. It could be argued that we should say that > we expect "3 or more" fields but given the age of the change we clearly do > expect 4 at this point. I disagree with making this error message lie about what the test was. Clearly we need to s/3, 1/1, 3/ but I don't think the number should be different from what we actually allow. Having said that, maybe there's a case for requiring 4 columns now. I agree it's pretty unlikely that current releases would see a pre-9.4 server on the other end of the line. regards, tom lane
Commits
-
Fix typo in comment
- d86038bd4d81 14.11 landed
- c5962ad21a6e 17.0 landed
- 810c9609f8a5 16.2 landed
- 5902ba5b21da 12.18 landed
- 419b6cb885a5 15.6 landed
- 00b222226f81 13.14 landed