Re: Initial review of xslt with no limits patch
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Cc: Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>, Mike Fowler <mike@mlfowler.com>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2010-08-06T18:13:19Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes: > Why wouldn't we just pass two text arrays to this function and be done > with it? That would work too, although I think it might be a bit harder to use than one alternating-name-and-value array, at least in some scenarios. You'd have to be careful that you got the values in the same order in both arrays, which'd be easy to botch. There might be other use-cases where two separate arrays are easier to use, but I'm not seeing one offhand. regards, tom lane