Re: ltree_gist indexes broken after pg_upgrade from 12 to 13

Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>, Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@enterprisedb.com>, Nikita Glukhov <n.gluhov@postgrespro.ru>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2022-03-10T17:05:31Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On 3/10/22 10:53, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes:
>> On 3/6/22 17:33, Andres Freund wrote:
>>> A sequence of
>>> pg_upgrade; amcheck; upgrade all extensions; amcheck;
>>> would make sense.
>> See
>> <https://github.com/PGBuildFarm/client-code/commit/191df23bd25eb5546b0989d71ae92747151f9f39>
> Does this detect the problem at hand?
>
> 			


AIUI, amcheck doesn't check gist indexes, hence Andres' "even if it
wouldn't even help in this case". So no.


cheers


andrew


--
Andrew Dunstan
EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com




Commits

Same data as JSON: GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources. API reference →
  1. Fix default signature length for gist_ltree_ops

  2. Implement operator class parameters