Re: ltree_gist indexes broken after pg_upgrade from 12 to 13
Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>
From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>,
Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@enterprisedb.com>,
Nikita Glukhov <n.gluhov@postgrespro.ru>,
PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2022-03-10T17:05:31Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On 3/10/22 10:53, Tom Lane wrote: > Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes: >> On 3/6/22 17:33, Andres Freund wrote: >>> A sequence of >>> pg_upgrade; amcheck; upgrade all extensions; amcheck; >>> would make sense. >> See >> <https://github.com/PGBuildFarm/client-code/commit/191df23bd25eb5546b0989d71ae92747151f9f39> > Does this detect the problem at hand? > > AIUI, amcheck doesn't check gist indexes, hence Andres' "even if it wouldn't even help in this case". So no. cheers andrew -- Andrew Dunstan EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com
Commits
Same data as JSON:
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Fix default signature length for gist_ltree_ops
- bad202c615c9 13.7 landed
- 7d30f59da714 14.3 landed
- 7e74aafc4335 15.0 landed
-
Implement operator class parameters
- 911e70207703 13.0 cited