Re: Support for NSS as a libpq TLS backend
Jacob Champion <pchampion@vmware.com>
From: Jacob Champion <pchampion@vmware.com>
To: "daniel@yesql.se" <daniel@yesql.se>, "sfrost@snowman.net" <sfrost@snowman.net>
Cc: "pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org" <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>, "hlinnaka@iki.fi" <hlinnaka@iki.fi>, "andrew.dunstan@2ndquadrant.com" <andrew.dunstan@2ndquadrant.com>, "thomas.munro@gmail.com" <thomas.munro@gmail.com>, "michael@paquier.xyz" <michael@paquier.xyz>, "andres@anarazel.de" <andres@anarazel.de>
Date: 2021-03-24T00:05:35Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Tue, 2021-03-23 at 00:38 +0100, Daniel Gustafsson wrote: > This rebase also includes a fix for pgtls_init which was sent offlist by Jacob. > The changes in pgtls_init can potentially be used to initialize the crypto > context for NSS to clean up this patch, Jacob is currently looking at that. I'm having a hell of a time trying to get the context stuff working. Findings so far (I have patches in progress for many of these, but it's all blowing up because of the last problem): NSS_INIT_NOROOTINIT is hardcoded for NSS_InitContext(), so we probably don't need to pass it explicitly. NSS_INIT_PK11RELOAD is apparently meant to hack around libraries that do their own PKCS loading; do we need it? NSS_ShutdownContext() can (and does) fail if we've leaked handles to objects, so we need to check its return value. Once this happens, future NSS_InitContext() calls behave poorly. Currently we leak the pr_fd as well as a handful of server_cert handles. NSS_NoDB_Init() is going to pin NSS in memory. For the backend this is probably okay, but for libpq clients that's probably not what we want. The first database loaded by NSS_InitContext() becomes the "default" database. This is what I'm currently hung up on. I can't figure out how to get NSS to use the database that was loaded for the current connection, so in my local patches for the issues above, client certificates fail to load. I can work around it temporarily for the tests, but this will be a problem if any libpq clients load up multiple independent databases for use with separate connections. Anyone know if this is a supported use case for NSS? --Jacob
Commits
-
Add tab-completion for CREATE FOREIGN TABLE.
- 74527c3e022d 15.0 cited
-
Add tap tests for the schema publications.
- 6b0f6f79eef2 15.0 cited
-
Move Perl test modules to a better namespace
- b3b4d8e68ae8 15.0 cited
-
Adjust configure to insist on Perl version >= 5.8.3.
- 92e6a98c3636 15.0 cited
-
Simplify code related to compilation of SSL and OpenSSL
- 092b785fad3d 14.0 landed
-
Introduce --with-ssl={openssl} as a configure option
- fe61df7f82aa 14.0 landed
-
Implement support for bulk inserts in postgres_fdw
- b663a4136331 14.0 cited
-
Fix redundant error messages in client tools
- 6be725e70161 14.0 cited
-
doc: Apply more consistently <productname> markup for OpenSSL
- 089da3c4778f 14.0 landed
-
Check ssl_in_use flag when reporting statistics
- 6a5c750f3f72 14.0 cited