Re: ALTER TABLE DROP COLUMN
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: The Hermit Hacker <scrappy@hub.org>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>, Hiroshi Inoue <Inoue@tpf.co.jp>, PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers@postgreSQL.org>
Date: 2000-10-09T22:09:17Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
The Hermit Hacker <scrappy@hub.org> writes: > hrmm .. mvcc uses a timestamp, no? is there no way of using that > timestamp to determine which columns have/haven't been cleaned up > following a crash? maybe some way of marking a table as being in a 'drop > column' mode, so that when it gets brought back up again, it is scan'd for > any tuples older then that date? WAL would provide the framework to do something like that, but I still say it'd be a bad idea. What you're describing is irrevocable-once-it-starts DROP COLUMN; there is no way to roll it back. We're trying to get rid of statements that act that way, not add more. I am not convinced that a 2x penalty for DROP COLUMN is such a huge problem that we should give up all the normal safety features of SQL in order to avoid it. Seems to me that DROP COLUMN is only a big issue during DB development, when you're usually working with relatively small amounts of test data anyway. regards, tom lane