Re: Problem with declarative partitioning and COPY FROM
Ragnar Ouchterlony <ragnar.ouchterlony@agama.tv>
From: Ragnar Ouchterlony <ragnar.ouchterlony@agama.tv>
To: Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com>
Cc: <pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org>
Date: 2017-01-11T14:58:14Z
Lists: pgsql-bugs
On 2017-01-11 13:24, Amit Langote wrote: > There's a bug and has been reported on the -hackers mailing list as > well. Please try your example after applying the patch 0002 attached > with the following email: > https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/01bc4745-bac8-a033-96a1-8a42b45d2fc1%40lab.ntt.co.jp Ok, that is good! I tested the patch as is, but it did not make a difference. Then I read the patch more carefully. + /* + * FIXME: We don't engage the bulk-insert mode for partitioned tables, + * because the the heap relation is most likely change from one row to + * next due to tuple-routing. + */ + if (cstate->rel->rd_rel->relkind == RELKIND_PARTITIONED_TABLE) + bistate = GetBulkInsertState(); The if-statement does not match how I read the comment. That is, shouldn't it be "!=" rather than "=="? I have tested using that change and now I get the results I expect. /Ragnar Ouchterlony, Agama Technologies
Commits
-
Fix interaction of partitioned tables with BulkInsertState.
- b1ecb9b3fcfb 10.0 landed