Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign?
Andreas Karlsson <andreas@proxel.se>
From: Andreas Karlsson <andreas@proxel.se>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org
Date: 2020-04-16T22:05:33Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On 4/14/20 4:52 PM, Tom Lane wrote: > Andreas Karlsson <andreas@proxel.se> writes: >> That said, I agree with that quite many of our tables right now are >> ugly, but I prefer ugly to hard to read. For me the mix of having every >> third row split into two fields makes the tables very hard to read. I >> have a hard time seeing which rows belong to which function. > > Did you look at the variants without that discussed downthread? Yeah, I did some of them are quite readable, for example your latest two screenshots of table 9.10. Andreas
Commits
-
Doc: re-re-revise markup for tables of functions.
- 4ad047a6eac3 13.0 landed
-
Doc: revise formatting of function/operator tables.
- 737d69ffc3cf 13.0 landed