Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign?

Andreas Karlsson <andreas@proxel.se>

From: Andreas Karlsson <andreas@proxel.se>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org
Date: 2020-04-16T22:05:33Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On 4/14/20 4:52 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andreas Karlsson <andreas@proxel.se> writes:
>> That said, I agree with that quite many of our tables right now are
>> ugly, but I prefer ugly to hard to read. For me the mix of having every
>> third row split into two fields makes the tables very hard to read. I
>> have a hard time seeing which rows belong to which function.
> 
> Did you look at the variants without that discussed downthread?

Yeah, I did some of them are quite readable, for example your latest two 
screenshots of table 9.10.

Andreas



Commits

  1. Doc: re-re-revise markup for tables of functions.

  2. Doc: revise formatting of function/operator tables.