Re: OpenSSL support in our back branches
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Cc: Andreas Karlsson <andreas@proxel.se>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2017-04-15T23:13:04Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> writes: > On 2017-04-15 18:04:00 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: >> I see that buildfarm member anchovy has been failing in pre-9.5 >> branches for the last several weeks, with symptoms suggesting that >> it's been updated to openssl 1.1.0 or later. The failures are >> unsurprising given that commit 593d4e47d wasn't back-patched further >> than 9.5, but I wonder whether it isn't time to do that now. > +1. > I think Andreas already did some of the required work in > http://archives.postgresql.org/message-id/0c817abb-3f7d-20fb-583a-58f7593a0bea%40proxel.se Oh, right. I'll see what I can do with that. regards, tom lane
Commits
-
Support OpenSSL 1.1.0 in 9.3 and 9.2.
- fb50c38e9cb4 9.2.21 landed
- 4e91330daca0 9.3.17 landed
-
Support OpenSSL 1.1.0 in 9.4 branch.
- bb132cddf870 9.4.12 landed
-
Support OpenSSL 1.1.0.
- 593d4e47db7a 10.0 cited