Re: Terminate the idle sessions

Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com> writes:
> On Thu, Jan 7, 2021 at 4:51 PM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com> writes:
>>> One of the strange things about these errors is that they're
>>> asynchronous/unsolicited, but they appear to the client to be the
>>> response to their next request (if it doesn't eat ECONNRESET instead).

>> Right, which is what makes class 57 (operator intervention) seem
>> attractive to me.  From the client's standpoint these look little
>> different from ERRCODE_ADMIN_SHUTDOWN or ERRCODE_CRASH_SHUTDOWN,
>> which are in that category.

> Yeah, that's a good argument.

Given the lack of commentary on this thread, I'm guessing that people
aren't so excited about this topic that a change in the existing sqlstate
assignment for ERRCODE_IDLE_IN_TRANSACTION_SESSION_TIMEOUT would fly.
So I propose to change the new ERRCODE_IDLE_SESSION_TIMEOUT to be in
class 57 and call it good.

			regards, tom lane