Re: Repetition of warning message while REVOKE

Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net> writes:
> * Tom Lane (tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us) wrote:
>> One thought is that the column cases should be phrased more like
>> no privileges could be revoked for column "foo" of table "bar"

> Looks like 'for column "foo" of relation "bar"' is more typical, so
> that's what I did in the attached patch.  I also cleaned up a few other
> things I noticed in looking through the various messages/comments.

Applied, except I omitted the one comment change because it didn't seem
to me to clarify anything.  Sequences are a subclass of relations, so
"table or sequence" makes sense to me while "relation or sequence"
doesn't.

			regards, tom lane