Thread

  1. RE: [HACKERS] Re: CODE ANALYSIS FOR (an apparent error in answer from "##" (closest proximity)operator)

    Peter Mount <peter@maidstone.gov.uk> — 1998-05-01T07:12:00Z

    I'd like to keep track of any changes you make so I can keep the JDBC
    Geometric classes in sync.
    
    --
    Peter T Mount, peter@maidstone.gov.uk, peter@retep.org.uk
    Please note that this is from my works email. If you reply, please cc my
    home address.
    
    
    -----Original Message-----
    From: owner-pgsql-hackers@hub.org [mailto:owner-pgsql-hackers@hub.org]On
    Behalf Of Thomas G. Lockhart
    Sent: Friday, May 01, 1998 3:22 AM
    To: Gautam H Thaker
    Cc: Postgres Hackers List
    Subject: [HACKERS] Re: CODE ANALYSIS FOR (an apparent error in answer
    from "##" (closest proximity)operator)
    
    
    > OK, I will try to work on this and provide you tested code.
    > (Since this is my first attempt to code in Postgres
    > it might take me a while though I have hacked for many
    > years overall.)
    
    No problem.
    
    > Lines are more useful to me than lsegs. Is it easy
    > enough to add these input/output routines so that I can
    > continue to move forward prior to V6.4?
    
    Yes. I'm starting to do that now, and we can coordinate patches. We may
    as well copy the hackers list on at least our planning e-mails...
    
                          - Tom