Re: testing plpython3u on 9.0beta2
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, Chris <rfusca@gmail.com>
Date: 2010-06-29T00:45:35Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes: > Why are we using RTLD_GLOBAL? Some guy named Eisentraut wanted it for plpython: http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2001-05/msg00563.php http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-committers/2001-05/msg00283.php Possibly that no longer applies, though. In general it seems like our usage of loadable modules treats them all as independent objects, so that not using RTLD_GLOBAL would be a more sensible policy. If it won't break any of the existing PLs then I'm fine with removing it. regards, tom lane