Horton

Re: RFC: Additional Directory for Extensions

David E. Wheeler <david@justatheory.com>

View thread View on postgr.es
From: "David E. Wheeler" <david@justatheory.com>
To: Gabriele Bartolini <gabriele.bartolini@enterprisedb.com>
Cc: Matheus Alcantara <matheusssilv97@gmail.com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>, Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentraut.org>, Craig Ringer <craig.ringer@enterprisedb.com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2025-03-03T15:10:44Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers 
On Mar 3, 2025, at 10:05, David E. Wheeler <david@justatheory.com> wrote:

> Very nice writeup, thank you. Makes me wish for the bandwidth to get back to and start refining the PGXN OCI RFC

Forgot to link to the POC[1]. The RFC[2] is not OCI-specific, but the POC demonstrates the “full content” version. Will likely want to modify the binary distribution RFC to adopt a standard layout that allows for volume mounting to “install” an extension.

Best,

David

1: https://justatheory.com/2024/06/trunk-oci-poc/
2: https://github.com/pgxn/rfcs/pull/2

Commits

  1. doc: Flesh out extension docs for the "prefix" make variable

  2. Fix extension control path tests

  3. extension_control_path