Re: Possible bug acldefault function
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Inzamam Shafiq <inzamam.shafiq@hotmail.com>
Cc: "pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org" <pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2025-03-19T15:45:20Z
Lists: pgsql-bugs
Inzamam Shafiq <inzamam.shafiq@hotmail.com> writes: > I came across an issue while working with acldefault function on materialized view, which threw an error "ERROR: unrecognized objtype abbreviation: m", when I looked at the source code of acldefault_sql it seems that materialized view case is not handled there, the SQL statement which I was executing is as follows, No, acldefault doesn't consider 'm' to be valid input, because materialized views are not a distinct kind of object for ACL purposes; they're just relations (tables), and have relation-y privileges. In fact, none of the object type codes accepted by acldefault_sql are relkind values, except for the accidental overlap of 'r' with the relkind for plain tables. regards, tom lane