Re: doc: Mention clock synchronization recommendation for hot_standby_feedback

Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentraut.org>

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentraut.org>
To: Jakub Wartak <jakub.wartak@enterprisedb.com>, vignesh C <vignesh21@gmail.com>
Cc: Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>, Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2025-03-31T14:58:35Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On 24.03.25 10:24, Jakub Wartak wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 14, 2025 at 11:31 AM vignesh C <vignesh21@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, 5 Mar 2025 at 11:46, Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Tue, Mar 4, 2025 at 4:44 PM Jakub Wartak
>>>
>>> I can go with the last patch as you observed that in a real-world
>>> case, and we can look at others (if any) on a case-to-case basis.
>>> Fujii-San, others, do you have any opinion on this?
>>
>> +1 for this approach.
>>
> 
> OK, so I have set this as Ready for Committer (I assume everybody who
> wanted to take voice already did).

committed




Commits

  1. doc: Mention clock synchronization recommendation for hot_standby_feedback