Re: pgsql: Doc: Update the interaction of tablesync with wal_retrieve_retry
Erik Rijkers <er@xs4all.nl>
From: Erik Rijkers <er@xs4all.nl>
To: Amit Kapila <akapila@postgresql.org>,
PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2025-01-23T11:26:06Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On 1/22/25 06:34, Amit Kapila wrote: > Doc: Update the interaction of tablesync with wal_retrieve_retry_interval. > Branch > ------ > master > > Details > ------- > https://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/4a0e7314f11ee03adfe9df945598c068b4179314 Hi, In this sentence : "The initial data in existing subscribed tables are snapshotted and copied in a parallel instances of a special kind of apply process." "copied in a parallel instances" seems wrong. It should be either (1) singular "in a parallel instance" or (2) plural "in parallel instances" I'm not sure which is meant. I also wonder if 'instance' is actually the correct word here at all; see the Glossary definition of 'instance': "A group of backend and auxiliary processes that communicate using a common shared memory area. One postmaster process manages the instance; one instance manages exactly one database cluster with all its databases. Many instances can run on the same server as long as their TCP ports do not conflict." Thanks, Erik > Modified Files > -------------- > doc/src/sgml/config.sgml | 3 ++- > doc/src/sgml/logical-replication.sgml | 35 +++++++++++++++++++++++------------ > 2 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-) >
Commits
Same data as JSON:
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Doc: Fix a typo introduced in 4a0e7314f1.
- 6fc4fc42da07 18.0 landed
-
Doc: Update the interaction of tablesync with wal_retrieve_retry_interval.
- 4a0e7314f11e 18.0 cited