Re: Relation bulk write facility
Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi>
From: Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi>
To: Peter Smith <smithpb2250@gmail.com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Cc: vignesh C <vignesh21@gmail.com>, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>,
pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>,
Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
Date: 2024-01-25T20:07:04Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Commits
Same data as JSON:
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Relax fsyncing at end of a bulk load that was not WAL-logged
- 68f199cea3b1 17.0 landed
- 077ad4bd76b1 18.0 landed
-
Fix cross-version upgrade tests after f0827b443.
- e8aecc5c2ce1 17.0 landed
-
Remove AIX support
- 0b16bb8776bb 17.0 landed
-
Fix compiler warning on typedef redeclaration
- d360e3cc60e3 17.0 landed
-
Introduce a new smgr bulk loading facility.
- 8af256524893 17.0 landed
Attachments
- v5-0001-Introduce-a-new-bulk-loading-facility.patch (text/x-patch) patch v5-0001
On 10/01/2024 18:17, Robert Haas wrote: > I think we should try to pick prefixes that are one or more words > rather than using word fragments. bulkw is an awkward prefix even for > people whose first language is English, and probably more awkward for > others. Renamed the 'bulkw' variables to 'bulkstate, and the functions to have smgr_bulk_* prefix. I was tempted to use just bulk_* as the prefix, but I'm afraid e.g. bulk_write() is too generic. On 22/01/2024 07:50, Peter Smith wrote: > Hi, This patch has a CF status of "Needs Review" [1], but it seems > there was a CFbot test failure last time it was run [2]. Please have a > look and post an updated version if necessary. Fixed the headerscheck failure by adding appropriate #includes. -- Heikki Linnakangas Neon (https://neon.tech)