Re: Removing unneeded self joins

Andrei Lepikhov <lepihov@gmail.com>

From: Andrei Lepikhov <lepihov@gmail.com>
To: jian he <jian.universality@gmail.com>, Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov@gmail.com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, Andrei Lepikhov <a.lepikhov@postgrespro.ru>, Richard Guo <guofenglinux@gmail.com>, Alexander Lakhin <exclusion@gmail.com>, "Gregory Stark (as CFM)" <stark.cfm@gmail.com>, Michał Kłeczek <michal@kleczek.org>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2024-07-15T06:08:43Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Commits

Same data as JSON: GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources. API reference →
  1. Remove GUC_NOT_IN_SAMPLE from enable_self_join_elimination

  2. Put enable_self_join_elimination into postgresql.conf.sample

  3. Get rid of ojrelid local variable in remove_rel_from_query()

  4. Implement Self-Join Elimination

  5. Revert: Remove useless self-joins

  6. Replace lateral references to removed rels in subqueries

  7. Replace relids in lateral subquery parse tree during SJE

  8. Forbid SJE with result relation

  9. Fix misuse of RelOptInfo.unique_for_rels cache by SJE

  10. Replace the relid in some missing fields during SJE

  11. Revert 56-bit relfilenode change and follow-up commits.

  12. Stabilize timetz test across DST transitions.

  13. Speed up finding EquivalenceClasses for a given set of rels

  14. Fix mark-and-restore-skipping test case to not be a self-join.

On 7/15/24 12:31, jian he wrote:
> hi.
> Here is the latest patch (v6),
> I've made the following changes.
> 
> * disallow original Query->resultRelation participate in SJE.
> for SELECT, nothing is changed. for UPDATE/DELETE/MERGE
> we can do:
> EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF)
> UPDATE sj sq SET b = sq.b + sz.a FROM (select s1.* from sj s1 join sj
> s2 on s1.a = s2.a) as sz
> WHERE sz.a = sq.a;
> 
> here, only "(select s1.* from sj s1 join sj s2 on s1.a = s2.a)" can
> apply to SJE.
> 
> but for now we cannot apply SJE to
> EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF)
> UPDATE sj sq SET b = sq.b + sz.a FROM sj as sz WHERE sz.a = sq.a;
> 
> so the EPQ abnormality issue[1] won't happen.
> 
> 
> * add a new function: ChangeVarNodesExtended for
> address concerns in  [2]
I see you still stay with the code line:
if (omark && imark && omark->markType != imark->markType)

It is definitely an error. What if omark is NULL, but imark is not? Why 
not to skip this pair of relids? Or, at least, insert an assertion to 
check that you filtered it earlier.

-- 
regards, Andrei Lepikhov