Re: meson: Non-feature feature options

On 09.03.23 14:54, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
>> On 9 Mar 2023, at 14:45, Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
> 
>> How about we just hardcode "openssl" here instead?  We could build that array dynamically, of course, but maybe we leave that until we actually have a need?
> 
> At least for 16 keeping it hardcoded is an entirely safe bet so +1 for leaving
> additional complexity for when needed.

I have committed it like this.

I didn't like the other variants, because they would cause the openssl 
line to stick out for purely implementation reasons (e.g., we don't have 
a line "compression: YES (lz4)".  If we get support for another ssl 
library, we can easily reconsider this.