Re: Avoid too prominent use of "backup" on pg_dump man page

On 31.05.24 10:24, Laurenz Albe wrote:
> On Thu, 2024-05-30 at 08:21 +0200, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
>> No objections to using export over backup, but it does make the use of
>> "restore" feel awkward as that's generally an operation on a backup and not an
>> export.
>>
>> -        least one schema/table in the backup file.
>> +        least one schema/table in the file to be restored.
>>
>> Would it make sense to use "import" in some cases instead?
> 
> What about calling it "dump file" instead of "file to be restored"?

I forgot about this one for a bit.  I committed it now as I had proposed 
it.  The pg_restore man page consistently talks about "restoring" a 
file, so this change makes that more consistent.  Introducing another 
verb would require more changes to properly introduce and explain it, 
which seems out of scope for this particular patch.